Our other responsibilities with respect to the Sustainability Reporting include:
• obtaining an understanding of the entity’s control environment, processes and information systems
relevant to the preparation of the Sustainability Reporting, but not evaluating the design of specific
controls, nor obtaining evidence about their implementation or testing the operating effectiveness
of those controls,
• identifying disclosures in which material misstatements are likely to arise, whether due to fraud
or error,
• designing and performing procedures on disclosures in the Sustainability Reporting in which material
misstatements are likely to arise. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud
is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional
omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Our opinion on the Sustainability Reporting does not cover other information accompanying the Sustainability
Reporting and our assurance report, or containing them, nor information contained in the Sustainability
Reporting that is not subject to assurance.
Summary of the work performed
A limited assurance engagement on sustainability reporting involves performing procedures to obtain evidence
about the Sustainability Reporting. The nature, timing and extent of procedures selected depend on
professional judgment, including the identification of disclosures in the Sustainability Reporting in which material
misstatements are likely to arise, whether due to fraud or error.
In conducting our limited assurance engagement on the Sustainability Reporting, we performed the following
procedures:
• we obtained an understanding of the Materiality Assessment Process by:
o performing inquiries to understand the sources of the information used by the Management
Board, such as stakeholder engagement, business plans and strategy documents,
o familiarising ourselves with the documentation provided to us in this regard,
• we checked whether the results of the Materiality Assessment Process were properly included in the
Sustainability Reporting,
• we obtained an understanding of the reporting process relevant to the preparation of the Sustainability
Reporting by understanding of the Group’s control environment, processes, and information system
relevant to the preparation of the Sustainability Reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control,
• we evaluated whether the information identified by the Materiality Assessment Process is included
in the Sustainability Reporting,
• we evaluated whether the structure and the presentation of the Sustainability Reporting is in
accordance with the ESRS;
• we performed inquiries of the Parent’s employees responsible for the preparation of the Sustainability
Reporting and we performed analytical procedures on selected information in the Sustainability
Reporting,
• we performed substantive assurance procedures on selected information in the Sustainability
Reporting,
• where applicable, we compared disclosures in the Sustainability Reporting with the corresponding
disclosures other elements of the Group’s annual report (including the separate financial statements
and consolidated financial statements),
• we evaluated the methods, assumptions and data used for developing estimates and forward-looking
information,
• we analysed compliance with minimum safeguards by analysing evidence regarding methods and
assumptions used to assess compliance with minimum safeguards,
• we obtained an understanding of the Parent’s process to identify taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-
aligned economic activities and the corresponding disclosures in the Sustainability Reporting.